Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wargames:seville:anglona [2026/05/14 19:35] – created peter
+++ wargames:seville:anglona [2026/05/14 21:31] (current) – peter
@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ^ November 1809 (Nafziger 809KSAA) ^ September 1810 (Nafziger 810ISAE ^ Type ^
-| Borbon | Borbon | Line |
+| Borbon | Borbon | Original Line |
-| Sagunto | Sagunto | Line |
+| Sagunto | Sagunto | Original Dragoon |
-| Granada de Llerena | Granada de Llerena |  |
+| Granada de Llerena | Granada de Llerena | New Line |
-|  | Reina | Line |
+|  | Reina | Original Line (based on Partridge & Oliver listing as at Gebora) |
-|  | Lusitania |  |
+|  | Lusitania | Original Dragoon (Patridge & Oliver list as at Gebora) |
-|  | 1st Hussar Regiment | ? |
+|  | 1st Hussar Regiment | Partridge & Oliver list as 1st Husares de Estremadura at Gebora |
-|  | 2nd Hussar Regiment | ? |
+|  | 2nd Hussar Regiment | Unsure. There is a 2nd Husares de Estremadura, not given by Partridge  Oliver as at Gebora. There's a Husares de Castilla not at Gebora but at Albuera |
 |  | Escadrones Provisionales | ? |
+I think this suggests that my original choice of Borbon line cavalry, Lusitania dragoons, and Granaderos de Llerena was //nearly// correct. In fact, it should be Borbon, //Sagunto dragoons// and Granaderos de Llerena as a reasonable brigade or division of cavalry to accompany Ballasteros and Contreras into the Sierra in pursuit of the French initially in early 1810. I should though ditch the Carabinieros Reales.
+I should revisit that though when I come to later chapters in the campaign, and do some further research on the cavalry that accompanied Ballasteros in the later campaign. Did that include the Husares de Castilla? A closer reading of Romero might help, and the book on Villanueva de Castillejos.